A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a very publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building will work at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, seek out to create their spouse and children home. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, in which growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of founded people. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining constructed by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those people of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their setting up permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic attempts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they had been meant to Get visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o for the duration of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined intimately by the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read even more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the Main of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple just trying to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that each one works are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into The ocean all through a storm, don't change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous the businessman had Beforehand been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods and René Collier waded via midsection-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both of those the Bodily reality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature in the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as constructed complies with planning authorization and no matter if any encroachment into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging conditions. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who should live together with each other long once the authorized expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent times.